Next.js is a powerful full-stack React framework known for its performance, developer experience, and tight integration with Vercel. However, even robust frameworks like Next.js can harbor subtle but impactful vulnerabilities. One such flaw involves the silent bypass of middleware, potentially exposing sensitive routes that developers believe are protected.
In this article, we’ll explore this vulnerability in detail, including how it arises, ways to reproduce and discover it, and most importantly, how to protect your application from unintentional exposure of protected resources. We’ll include practical coding examples throughout and conclude with a comprehensive checklist to harden your Next.js security posture.
Understanding Next.js Middleware
Middleware in Next.js (introduced in version 12 and improved in version 13+) allows you to run logic before a request is completed. Common use cases include:
-
Authentication/authorization
-
Bot protection
-
Localization
-
Logging and monitoring
Here’s a basic example:
At first glance, this appears to secure sensitive areas of your app. However, a flaw in route matching and server rendering behavior can be exploited to silently bypass this middleware.
The Vulnerability: Middleware Bypass via Static Optimization
Scenario:
-
You set up middleware to protect sensitive routes like
/dashboard
. -
You accidentally or unknowingly statically generate the
/dashboard
route at build time usinggetStaticProps()
orexport
.
Consequence:
-
Static pages are served directly from the edge/CDN and bypass middleware entirely.
-
Any protected route with
getStaticProps
will not go through your middleware unless explicitly handled.
Example of an unsafe static page:
Even if /dashboard
is listed in your middleware matcher, the page can be accessed directly without authentication if deployed as static HTML.
This is particularly dangerous because:
-
It’s silent – no error or warning is shown.
-
It breaks assumptions – developers think routes are protected, but they’re not.
-
It may leak personal or privileged content if static data contains user-specific information.
How to Reproduce the Flaw
Create a Next.js app:
Add middleware to protect /dashboard
:
Add a static page at /dashboard/index.tsx
:
Start the app (npm run dev
) and access /dashboard
.
Observe: Even without a token, you can access the dashboard.
If you check npm run build
followed by npm start
, you’ll see that this route is being served statically.
How To Discover Affected Routes
To identify potential vulnerabilities:
Audit All Routes Using getStaticProps
Use static analysis tools (like grep
, eslint
, or tsquery
) to detect:
Manually review each file to ensure none of them expose user-specific or sensitive information.
Check Your Build Output
Run:
Then examine the .next
output:
You’ll see whether the page is treated as static or SSR.
Enable Strict Middleware Warnings
If deploying to Vercel, enable middleware warnings in your project dashboard or use logging in your middleware function to confirm execution.
How To Protect Your Application
Here are several strategies to eliminate the risk of this flaw:
Use getServerSideProps
for Protected Pages
Convert your page to use server-side rendering:
With getServerSideProps
, middleware will always run, and data can be tailored per request.
Guard Routes Using Custom Higher-Order Components (HOCs)
Wrap your page components with an authentication check on the client (though not a replacement for server protection):
Apply it to pages:
Use Middleware with Edge Functions in Mind
Make sure your middleware is compatible with both static and dynamic rendering. This may involve:
-
Avoiding
getStaticProps
for protected routes -
Using route conventions like
/public/*
and/private/*
for easy matching -
Logging all middleware hits and reviewing logs during QA and production
Disable Static Optimization Explicitly
Force a page to be dynamically rendered by using getServerSideProps
even if the data doesn’t change:
This is a simple hack to bypass static rendering when in doubt.
Add Automated Static Route Checks in CI/CD
Write a script in your build pipeline to check for static pages under protected routes:
Best Practices Summary
Practice | Description |
---|---|
Avoid getStaticProps on protected routes |
Prevent bypass via static delivery |
Use getServerSideProps for dynamic user-based pages |
Ensures request context is always evaluated |
Use middleware + SSR for defense-in-depth | Middleware should redirect unauthenticated users |
Audit build output regularly | Detect unintended static generation |
Write CI checks | Prevent regressions and enforce rules |
Educate team members | Make this flaw a known part of code reviews |
Conclusion
Security in modern JavaScript frameworks like Next.js isn’t always as intuitive as it seems. Middleware offers a powerful mechanism to enforce authentication and route access, but it is not foolproof—especially when combined with features like static site generation. This article revealed a subtle yet critical flaw: middleware can be silently bypassed if a protected route is statically generated.
This misalignment can lead to serious security risks, especially if developers unknowingly expose authenticated areas like dashboards, admin panels, or internal documentation. We demonstrated how this vulnerability can be reproduced, how to detect it in your project, and outlined best practices to prevent such silent failures from reaching production.
To secure your app:
-
Avoid static generation for sensitive routes.
-
Use
getServerSideProps
to maintain dynamic access control. -
Leverage middleware strategically, but not as your only gatekeeper.
-
Review build outputs and static paths continuously.
-
Automate detection of static exposure in CI/CD pipelines.
Frameworks improve, and Next.js may address this behavior more transparently in the future. Until then, awareness and deliberate architectural decisions are your best defenses.
Always assume nothing is secure by default—explicit is better than implicit, and verification is key.